The Superintendent is a judicial forum devoted to condominium disputes, with jurisdiction over defined types of claims between apartment owners. Proceedings before the Superintendent are usually faster and less costly than equivalent proceedings in court.
Representation before the Superintendent of Land Registration
The Superintendent of Land Registration is a fully fledged judicial forum for condominium disputes. Representation in matters of common property, building management, TAMA 38 and holdout owners.
Under section 72 of the Land Law, 5729-1969, the Superintendent decides disputes between the owners of apartments in a condominium concerning their rights and obligations under the bylaws and under the Law. Under section 74 the Superintendent has the powers of a Magistrates' Court judge, and under section 77 the Superintendent's decision may be appealed to the District Court.
A condominium dispute in a 30-second video

The video loads from YouTube only after you click. Go to the video page and transcript
In the video: the Superintendent of Land Registration is a dedicated judicial forum for disputes between apartment owners, and between them and the house committee: common property, unpaid house committee charges, building work by a neighbour and nuisances. In TAMA 38 and evacuation and reconstruction (pinui binui) projects, the Superintendent also hears claims against holdout owners and decides whether the refusal is reasonable in the circumstances.
When to apply to the Superintendent
- When an apartment owner does not pay house committee charges or their share of repairs to the common property.
- When a neighbour takes over part of the common property: the stairwell, the roof, the yard or a parking space.
- When there is a dispute over an attachment of property to an apartment, over the bylaws or over a resolution of the general meeting.
- When an apartment owner refuses works on the common property under TAMA 38 and a two-thirds majority has been obtained (section 5 of the Land (Reinforcement of Condominiums against Earthquakes) Law, 5768-2008).
- When the house committee needs to act against an apartment owner on behalf of all the residents.
How the work proceeds
- Review and documents. The Land Registry extract, the condominium registration order, the bylaws and the plan, and the minutes of meetings. Together they build the picture: what is registered, what was resolved and what the position is on the ground.
- Approach and attempt to settle. A properly drafted letter to the other side and an attempt to reach a settlement. In a dispute between neighbours who will go on living in the same building, a binding settlement that also governs the future is sometimes the better solution.
- Claim before the Superintendent. Drafting the pleadings and attaching the evidence. Both an apartment owner and the house committee may file a claim (section 73).
- Hearing, decision and enforcement. Conducting the hearings and examinations of witnesses. The Superintendent's decision is enforced like a court judgment (section 76), and it may be appealed to the District Court (section 77).
A dedicated forum for condominium disputes
The Superintendent of Land Registration has jurisdiction to hear disputes between the owners of apartments in a condominium, and between them and the house committee. It is a professional judicial body devoted to precisely this kind of dispute, so proceedings before it are usually faster, more focused and less costly than equivalent proceedings in court.
That focus matters: the Superintendent is familiar with condominium bylaws, with the law of common property and with the dynamics between neighbours, and does not have to learn the field afresh in every case.
The issues that come before the Superintendent
- Common property: taking over common areas, enclosing the stairwell, exclusive use of the roof or yard, and attachments that were not lawfully registered.
- Building management: house committee charges, collecting debts from residents, resolutions of residents' meetings and their validity, and appointment of the house committee.
- Construction and renovation: additions built by a neighbour, balconies, lifts, air conditioning and the nuisances they create.
- Nuisance and damage: damp originating in another apartment, noise, smoking and recurring nuisances.
- Urban renewal: claims concerning holdout owners in TAMA 38 and evacuation and reconstruction (pinui binui) projects, and disputes between residents and the developer.
- Amending the condominium order: discrepancies between the registered position and the actual position.
The advantage of professional representation
Proceedings before the Superintendent are simpler than ordinary civil proceedings, but they are still judicial proceedings: there are pleadings, evidence, testimony and cross-examination. Success depends on an orderly presentation of the right documents, above all the condominium extract, the bylaws, the minutes of residents' meetings and documentation of the nuisance or the debt.
At the same time, many neighbour disputes are better resolved by settlement than by judgment, because the parties will go on living in the same building. Drafting a binding settlement that governs the future, and not only the past, is sometimes the best outcome.
Holdout owners and urban renewal
In TAMA 38 and evacuation and reconstruction (pinui binui) projects, the Superintendent is the forum that hears claims against an apartment owner who refuses to join the project, and decides whether the refusal is reasonable in the circumstances of the case. The firm acts in these cases on both sides: for residents seeking to advance a project, and for apartment owners who have substantive grounds to oppose it.
How we assist
The firm represents apartment owners, house committees and groups of residents before the Superintendent of Land Registration: gathering the documents, drafting the pleadings, conducting the hearings and examinations, and, where appropriate, negotiating a settlement out of court.
What to bring to the meeting
- Land Registry extract for the apartment and for the condominium.
- The condominium registration order, the bylaws and the plan.
- Minutes of meetings and resolutions of the house committee.
- Payment demands, invoices and receipts.
- Photographs of the situation on the ground.
- Correspondence with the other side.
Timeline and cost
Timetable: at the first conversation you receive an initial assessment of the situation. If the documents are sent in advance, the assessment is better informed. The length of proceedings before the Superintendent depends on the schedule of the Superintendent's office in the region. The deadline for appealing the Superintendent's decision is set by the regulations, so it is important to get in touch as soon as a decision is received.
Cost: the fee is set in a written fee agreement after the case has been reviewed. Court fees, expert opinions and other expenses are paid separately.
The Superintendent of Land Registration or a court
| Subject | Superintendent of Land Registration | Court |
|---|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Disputes between apartment owners in a condominium under section 72 of the Land Law | Civil claims within the court's jurisdiction |
| Procedure | May depart from the rules of evidence and procedure where this will help to establish the truth (section 75) | Under the Civil Procedure Regulations |
| Enforcement | As a court judgment (section 76) | Judgment |
| Appeal | To the District Court (section 77) | From a Magistrates' Court judgment, to the District Court |
Contact us to review your dispute
If you are involved in a condominium dispute, it is worth checking early which forum to proceed in and which documents are required. We will be glad to hear the details and explain the options.
Questions and answers
What is the difference between the Superintendent of Land Registration and a court?
Can unpaid house committee charges be collected through the Superintendent?
Yes. A claim against an apartment owner to recover unpaid house committee charges is one of the most common claims brought before the Superintendent, provided that the decisions imposing the charges were lawfully adopted and are documented.
What must be shown to bring a claim against a holdout owner in a TAMA 38 project?
It must be shown that the majority required by law has been obtained, that the proposal is reasonable, and that the apartment owner's refusal is unreasonable in the circumstances. Each case is examined on its own merits, according to the type and terms of the project.
Related articles and pages
- The Superintendent of Land Registration: the forum most apartment owners do not know about
- House committee charges for a penthouse
- Repaired shared plumbing on your own initiative?
- The neighbour split the building into separate units
- Building and extending in a building not registered as a condominium
- A house committee claim for defects in the common property
- Construction Defects
More on litigation
Need a lawyer or a notary?
A short initial consultation call, to understand whether and how we can help.
